8 try step one.67 ? 10 -5 w/kg. Playing with Eq.(6) it was receive (contained in this mistakes out-of mathematical integration) as like the entire stamina dissipated by-work up against the damping push of one’s oscillator.
Showing new authenticity away from Eq.(9), involving the quintessential importance of w -step 1 , an equivalent calculations was in fact constant, earliest playing with just one (new) drive volume from 3 Hz.
Figure 9. Just like Fig. 8 however with the fresh new drive regularity changed in one Hz in order to step three Hz. Maximum push speed magnitudes (within level of your Gaussian) was in fact a similar with the two cases; i.elizabeth., 0.02 yards / s 2 .
The entire electricity for Fig. (9) is actually 6 ? 10 -six w/kg so you can a couple of extreme figures. Three times it amount try more than the complete of Fig. 8 by the seven or 8 per cent. An inspection of line form of Fig. nine reveals that the difference off no ‘s the outcome of numerical consolidation problems. It can be quicker by using a larger quantity of FFT items than just 1024 and you can reducing the 0.step one s action proportions. Such as for example is considered too many having introduce intentions.
Because oscillator is linear, a force which contains each other signals is to yield a total stamina which is only the sum of the 2 totals mentioned;
Profile ten. Results of push of each other 1 Hz and step three Hz accelerations. 3 ? 10 -5 w/kg as needed having texture that have Parseval’s theorem. […]